<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word Choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kaitnolan.com/2008/12/30/word-choice-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kaitnolan.com/2008/12/30/word-choice-2/</link>
	<description>Action packed paranormal romance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan B.</title>
		<link>http://kaitnolan.com/2008/12/30/word-choice-2/#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://murderandmagnolias.com/wordpress/?p=1039#comment-2132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m one to turn to the thesaurus for that word I know exists, but I just can&#039;t seem to remember.  It&#039;s not usually because I need a different word that means the same thing because I&#039;ve already used up my quota of the original; it&#039;s to find that word that I know has the right shade of meaning or tone for what I&#039;m trying to say.

I know that I turn to the thesaurus a lot more when I&#039;m just getting back into writing.  If I&#039;ve been writing regularly for a time, my vocabulary seems much more accessible.  But if I&#039;ve been on hiatus (again), then it&#039;s buried in mothballs back there somewhere, and it&#039;s easier to visit thesaurus.com than to dig it out of the mess.

 :evil: &quot;Too Mad&quot;, says B.  You know how anti-emoticon I am, but she insists I place this one, so there you are.

Back to the subject-- you know that I think one can EASILY go overboard with language and description.  A middle road, possibly one that meanders closer to Simple Town, is often what I prefer.  I think it&#039;s partly reactionary on my part, the result of too much of flowery language in the 80&#039;s combined with my dislike of academic writing.  I&#039;m not impressed by the use of 50cent vocabulary, especially where it sticks out, and I LOATHE hyperbole.  I don&#039;t like it when characters who don&#039;t really matter to the story come overdressed (in language).

I guess I appreciate plain-speaking in my reading like I do in my dealings with people.  Rich and vivid description is good, but don&#039;t forget that you&#039;re telling me a story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one to turn to the thesaurus for that word I know exists, but I just can&#8217;t seem to remember.  It&#8217;s not usually because I need a different word that means the same thing because I&#8217;ve already used up my quota of the original; it&#8217;s to find that word that I know has the right shade of meaning or tone for what I&#8217;m trying to say.</p>
<p>I know that I turn to the thesaurus a lot more when I&#8217;m just getting back into writing.  If I&#8217;ve been writing regularly for a time, my vocabulary seems much more accessible.  But if I&#8217;ve been on hiatus (again), then it&#8217;s buried in mothballs back there somewhere, and it&#8217;s easier to visit thesaurus.com than to dig it out of the mess.</p>
<p> <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_evil.gif' alt=':evil:' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8220;Too Mad&#8221;, says B.  You know how anti-emoticon I am, but she insists I place this one, so there you are.</p>
<p>Back to the subject&#8211; you know that I think one can EASILY go overboard with language and description.  A middle road, possibly one that meanders closer to Simple Town, is often what I prefer.  I think it&#8217;s partly reactionary on my part, the result of too much of flowery language in the 80&#8242;s combined with my dislike of academic writing.  I&#8217;m not impressed by the use of 50cent vocabulary, especially where it sticks out, and I LOATHE hyperbole.  I don&#8217;t like it when characters who don&#8217;t really matter to the story come overdressed (in language).</p>
<p>I guess I appreciate plain-speaking in my reading like I do in my dealings with people.  Rich and vivid description is good, but don&#8217;t forget that you&#8217;re telling me a story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

